"""The only place that talks to Gitea. Three unrelated conversations happen here, worth keeping apart in your head: * **Sign-in** uses OAuth2 on behalf of the person at the keyboard. The app is registered as a *confidential* client with a secret, which it can hold because it runs on the server. The Decap CMS app is the opposite — a public client using PKCE — because that one runs in the visitor's browser and has nowhere to keep a secret. * **Creating an account** uses a site-admin token belonging to the instance, not to any member. That token can create and modify any Gitea user, so the environment holding it is as sensitive as Gitea's own admin password. * **Reading and writing content** uses the signed-in member's *own* access token. Commits are then attributed to the person who actually wrote the post, and Gitea's permissions apply unchanged — the editor cannot grant write access to somebody who does not already have it. """ from __future__ import annotations import base64 import secrets import string from urllib.parse import quote, urlencode import requests from flask import current_app TIMEOUT = 10 class GiteaError(RuntimeError): """Gitea refused a request. The message is safe to show a member.""" class StaleFile(GiteaError): """The file changed since it was loaded into the form. Gitea rejects a write whose `sha` no longer matches the branch, which is what makes two people editing one post a visible conflict rather than a silent overwrite of whoever saved first. """ def _base() -> str: return current_app.config["GITEA_URL"].rstrip("/") def _api(path: str) -> str: return f"{_base()}/api/v1{path}" def _repo() -> str: return current_app.config["CONTENT_REPO"].strip("/") def _branch() -> str: return current_app.config["CONTENT_BRANCH"] # --- sign-in ------------------------------------------------------------- def authorize_url(state: str, redirect_uri: str) -> str: query = urlencode({ "client_id": current_app.config["OAUTH_CLIENT_ID"], "redirect_uri": redirect_uri, "response_type": "code", "state": state, }) return f"{_base()}/login/oauth/authorize?{query}" def _token_request(payload: dict) -> dict: response = requests.post( f"{_base()}/login/oauth/access_token", json={ "client_id": current_app.config["OAUTH_CLIENT_ID"], "client_secret": current_app.config["OAUTH_CLIENT_SECRET"], **payload, }, timeout=TIMEOUT, ) if response.status_code != 200: raise GiteaError("No se pudo completar el inicio de sesión.") data = response.json() if not data.get("access_token"): raise GiteaError("Gitea no devolvió un token de acceso.") return data def exchange_code(code: str, redirect_uri: str) -> dict: """Returns the whole token response, not just the access token. The refresh token matters: Gitea's access tokens last about an hour, and without refreshing, saving a post would start failing partway through an afternoon's work for no reason the writer could understand. """ return _token_request({ "code": code, "grant_type": "authorization_code", "redirect_uri": redirect_uri, }) def refresh_token(token: str) -> dict: return _token_request({"refresh_token": token, "grant_type": "refresh_token"}) def fetch_user(token: str) -> dict: response = requests.get( _api("/user"), headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {token}"}, timeout=TIMEOUT, ) if response.status_code != 200: raise GiteaError("No se pudo leer el perfil desde Gitea.") return response.json() # --- account creation (site-admin token) --------------------------------- def admin_configured() -> bool: """Whether this server holds a site-admin token. Without one it can neither create accounts nor set passwords. That is a supported configuration — server-setup.md §11.2 says why somebody might choose it — and it is why both calls below refuse before reaching Gitea. Exposed as a predicate so a screen can say so *before* asking somebody to fill in a form that cannot be saved, the way `mail.configured()` is used. """ return bool(current_app.config.get("ADMIN_TOKEN")) def generate_password() -> str: # Shown once to the admin, then changed by the member on first login. # Punctuation is left out on purpose: this gets read aloud or copied by # hand, and a password nobody can transcribe gets written on a note. alphabet = string.ascii_letters + string.digits return "".join(secrets.choice(alphabet) for _ in range(16)) def admin_create_user(login: str, email: str, full_name: str, password: str) -> None: token = current_app.config.get("ADMIN_TOKEN") if not token: raise GiteaError( "Falta GITEA_ADMIN_TOKEN: el servidor no puede crear cuentas nuevas." ) response = requests.post( _api("/admin/users"), headers={"Authorization": f"token {token}"}, json={ "username": login, "email": email, "full_name": full_name, "password": password, "must_change_password": True, "send_notify": False, }, timeout=TIMEOUT, ) if response.status_code in (201, 200): return if response.status_code == 422: raise GiteaError("Ese usuario o correo ya existe en Gitea.") if response.status_code in (401, 403): raise GiteaError("El token de administración de Gitea no es válido.") raise GiteaError(f"Gitea rechazó la creación del usuario ({response.status_code}).") def admin_set_password(login: str, password: str) -> None: """Set a member's password on their behalf, after they chose it here. This is what lets the whole invitation and reset flow stay inside /comunidad/ instead of handing people to Gitea, whose own recovery page is dead without a mailer anyway. `login_name` and `source_id` are sent although nothing about them changes: Gitea's EditUserOption has historically treated them as required, and omitting them has been reported to move a local account onto a different authentication source. For a local user they are the username and 0, so sending them is a no-op that avoids the question. """ token = current_app.config.get("ADMIN_TOKEN") if not token: raise GiteaError( "Falta GITEA_ADMIN_TOKEN: el servidor no puede cambiar contraseñas." ) response = requests.patch( _api(f"/admin/users/{quote(login, safe='')}"), headers={"Authorization": f"token {token}"}, json={ "password": password, "must_change_password": False, "login_name": login, "source_id": 0, }, timeout=TIMEOUT, ) if response.status_code in (200, 201): return if response.status_code == 422: # Gitea enforces its own minimum length and complexity, and its message # is in the admin's language rather than the member's, so it is not # passed through. raise GiteaError("Gitea rechazó esa contraseña. Prueba con una más larga.") if response.status_code in (401, 403): raise GiteaError("El token de administración de Gitea no es válido.") if response.status_code == 404: # Reachable: a member can be added here without ticking "crear también # su cuenta", and then invited. Everything works right up to this call, # which is asked to change the password of an account that was never # made. A bare "(404)" sends the admin looking at the wrong thing. raise GiteaError( f"No existe la cuenta «{login}» en Gitea, así que no se le puede " "poner contraseña. Pide a un administrador que la cree." ) raise GiteaError(f"Gitea rechazó el cambio de contraseña ({response.status_code}).") # --- content (the member's own token) ------------------------------------ def _contents_url(path: str) -> str: # quote() with no safe characters: a path segment is data, not structure. return _api(f"/repos/{_repo()}/contents/{quote(path, safe='/')}") def _content_request(method: str, url: str, token: str, **kwargs): response = requests.request( method, url, headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {token}"}, timeout=TIMEOUT, **kwargs, ) if response.status_code in (401, 403): raise PermissionError("gitea-unauthorised") # caller refreshes and retries return response def list_directory(path: str, token: str) -> list[dict]: """Names and shas only — the contents API does not return file bodies here.""" response = _content_request("GET", _contents_url(path), token, params={"ref": _branch()}) if response.status_code == 404: return [] # an empty content folder is normal, not an error if response.status_code != 200: raise GiteaError(f"Gitea no devolvió la lista de archivos ({response.status_code}).") payload = response.json() return [item for item in payload if item.get("type") == "file"] def read_file(path: str, token: str) -> tuple[str, str]: """(text, sha). The sha comes back so a later write can prove it is current.""" response = _content_request("GET", _contents_url(path), token, params={"ref": _branch()}) if response.status_code == 404: raise GiteaError("Ese archivo ya no existe.") if response.status_code != 200: raise GiteaError(f"No se pudo leer el archivo ({response.status_code}).") payload = response.json() text = base64.b64decode(payload.get("content", "")).decode("utf-8") return text, payload.get("sha", "") def write_file(path: str, data: bytes, message: str, token: str, sha: str | None = None) -> str: """Create when `sha` is None, update otherwise. Returns the new sha.""" body = { "content": base64.b64encode(data).decode("ascii"), "message": message, "branch": _branch(), } if sha: body["sha"] = sha response = _content_request("PUT" if sha else "POST", _contents_url(path), token, json=body) if response.status_code in (200, 201): return response.json().get("content", {}).get("sha", "") if response.status_code in (409, 422): raise StaleFile( "Alguien más guardó este archivo mientras lo editabas. " "Vuelve a abrirlo para no perder su trabajo." ) raise GiteaError(f"Gitea rechazó el guardado ({response.status_code}).") def delete_file(path: str, sha: str, message: str, token: str) -> None: response = _content_request("DELETE", _contents_url(path), token, json={ "sha": sha, "message": message, "branch": _branch(), }) if response.status_code in (200, 204): return if response.status_code in (409, 422): raise StaleFile("El archivo cambió desde que lo abriste. Recarga la lista.") raise GiteaError(f"Gitea rechazó el borrado ({response.status_code}).")